Cargo disputes
Cargo Disputes: Lesson 1-Overview
When a party ships goods by sea, there are two main contracts that will be involved: (1) the underlying sale contract; and (2) the contract of carriage to transport the goods from A to B. Either the buyer or the seller will organise the contract of carriage, but the carrier might end up in a dispute with either of those parties, so both buyer and seller want to be able to have privity of contract with the carrier. The following diagram shows how that happens.
The diagram also shows what happens at the financial level. A buyer thousands of miles away from a seller doesn't want to run the risk of non-delivery of the goods (or documents representing title to the goods), so they frequently use banks as intermediaries who give cross-undertaking to each other, which makes the process more secure (although not always!).
Because this diagram has lots of moving parts, we recommend you download the dynamic PowerPoint presentation below as well as look at this static diagram. It talks you through each stage.
overview powerpoint (dynamic)
overview powerpoint
(Static)
SSG Blog Page
If you have an article you think would be appropriate for SSG we would be delighted to hear from you. Just drop us a line and we'll get back to you as soon as we can.


Late Redelivery, MOAs, and the Long Reach of Res Inter Alios Acta: The Court of Appeal in The Skyros and The Agios Minas
![The wrong charterparty, the right injunction: G2 Ocean v Tokio Marine Brasil Seguradora (The Tanchou Arrow) [2026] EWHC 997 (Comm)](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/7118a7_ea4370dd81924623a30050d1d90f9291~mv2.jpeg/v1/fill/w_376,h_250,al_c,lg_1,q_30,blur_30,enc_avif,quality_auto/7118a7_ea4370dd81924623a30050d1d90f9291~mv2.webp)
![The wrong charterparty, the right injunction: G2 Ocean v Tokio Marine Brasil Seguradora (The Tanchou Arrow) [2026] EWHC 997 (Comm)](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/7118a7_ea4370dd81924623a30050d1d90f9291~mv2.jpeg/v1/fill/w_275,h_183,fp_0.50_0.50,q_90,enc_avif,quality_auto/7118a7_ea4370dd81924623a30050d1d90f9291~mv2.webp)
The wrong charterparty, the right injunction: G2 Ocean v Tokio Marine Brasil Seguradora (The Tanchou Arrow) [2026] EWHC 997 (Comm)


THE HAPPY ARAS — WHAT IT MEANS FOR OWNERS AND CARGO INSURERS


The “Kiveli” and “Afina I”: Head-On or Crossing? The Court of Appeal Decides


The Strait of Hormuz Crisis: Shipping Confronts Its Worst Nightmare


The “MSC Flaminia”: The Supreme Court on Charterers’ Right to Limit Liability


King Crude Carriers v Ridgebury: The Supreme Court Rejects “Deemed Fulfilment” in English Law
MSC’s Ascendancy and the Consolidation of Container Shipping


Record Fleet Growth: The Container Ship Orderbook and Its Consequences


The Red Sea Crisis Deepens: Global Shipping Reroutes Around Africa
The IMO’s EEXI and CII Regulations: Decarbonisation Gets Serious
The Great Freight Rate Correction: Shipping After the Pandemic Boom
The “Ever Smart” and “Alexandra 1”: The Supreme Court Clarifies the Collision Regulations


Understanding the Impact of the Russian-Ukraine War on Global Politics


FRAUD CLAIMS IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION.
![Enka v Chubb [2020] UKSC 38: The Supreme Court on Determining an Arbitration Agreement's Law](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/7118a7_7615fad3aaed4c798abea44a18ad9d42~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_375,h_250,al_c,q_30,blur_30,enc_avif,quality_auto/7118a7_7615fad3aaed4c798abea44a18ad9d42~mv2.webp)
![Enka v Chubb [2020] UKSC 38: The Supreme Court on Determining an Arbitration Agreement's Law](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/7118a7_7615fad3aaed4c798abea44a18ad9d42~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_474,h_316,fp_0.50_0.50,q_90,enc_avif,quality_auto/7118a7_7615fad3aaed4c798abea44a18ad9d42~mv2.webp)
Enka v Chubb [2020] UKSC 38: The Supreme Court on Determining an Arbitration Agreement's Law


Recent Changes to Determining the Law Governing an Arbitration Agreement


Covid-19 and Force Majeure in the Shipping Industry


Double-Recovery in Cargo Claims: Are Sales Contracts Truly "Res Inter Alios Acta"?
![Dera Commercial Estate v Derya Inc [2018] EWHC 1673 (Comm)](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/7118a7_39f8a9aff883427f995cc19923ce445b~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_400,h_250,al_c,q_30,blur_30,enc_avif,quality_auto/7118a7_39f8a9aff883427f995cc19923ce445b~mv2.webp)
![Dera Commercial Estate v Derya Inc [2018] EWHC 1673 (Comm)](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/7118a7_39f8a9aff883427f995cc19923ce445b~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_474,h_296,fp_0.50_0.50,q_90,enc_avif,quality_auto/7118a7_39f8a9aff883427f995cc19923ce445b~mv2.webp)

